RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A federal appeals court panel on Wednesday unanimously rejected North Carolina’s plan to replace a crucial Outer Banks bridge without rerouting a state highway away from a wildlife refuge.
The dispute centers on a plan to replicate the existing 2.5-mile Bonner Bridge across Oregon Inlet at a cost of $216 million. The bridge is the only span connecting the mainland to Hatteras Island and was designed to last 30 years when built in 1963.
Construction has been blocked by a lawsuit by environmental groups, who favor a 17-mile bridge that would bypass the Pea Island National Wildlife Refuge. The route favored by environmentalists would require building the second-longest bridge in the United States at a cost of more than $1 billion, state transportation officials said.
Environmentalists counter that changing the route would also help avoid recurring problems with the current road, which is frequently rendered impassable by water and sand kicked up by storms.
“At the heart of this case are the past and future of the Outer Banks,” Judge James Wynn wrote for the three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. “The effects of time threaten the structural integrity of the Bonner Bridge, while large storms and changing coastal conditions threaten the viability of the non-elevated portions of North Carolina Highway 12 south of the Bonner Bridge.”
The appeals court overruled a federal judge’s order last September allowing North Carolina an exception to laws protecting a wildlife refuge.
Opponents argued the state’s replacement plan leaves out the cost of moving or maintaining about 12 miles of N.C. 12 through the wildlife refuge. The highway has been breached by new inlets twice in the past several years. Environmentalists said the shorter bridge will be useless without additional infrastructure construction.
The road was closed for three days early last month after waves churned by Hurricane Arthur caused a small section of the fragile roadway to buckle.
The bridge was closed for nearly two weeks in December because sand had washed away from the bridgesupports. That closing led to a series of broadsides by the state’s top Republican leaders against the environmental lawsuit.
Senate leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, and House Speaker Thom Tillis, R-Mecklenburg, condemned the environmental law firm fighting replacement of the 50-year-old bridge as “liberal elitists.”
Transportation Secretary Tony Tata attacked the Southern Environmental Law Center as “ivory tower elitists.” The center’s attorneys were fighting in court “with their lattes and their contempt, and chuckle while the good people of the Outer Banks are fighting hard to scratch out a living here based on tourism and based on access,” Tata said.
SELC attorney Julie Youngman countered that Tata was distracting people from the DOT’s failure to plan a reliable route that would not be repeatedly washed out in coming decades.
Sen. Bill Cook released the following statement on the ruling:
“I am extremely pleased and thankful of the Fourth Circuit’s ruling that upholds N.C. DOT’s NEPA permit. This is another step in the right direction to replace the aging Bonner Bridge. The Outer Banks of North Carolina is a place of natural beauty. It is the birthplace of America, birthplace of aviation, and a destination for millions of visitors. About 2.4 million visitors travel from all around the world each year to see the outstanding wildlife and environmental beauty of the Outer Banks,” Sen. Bill Cook (R-District 1) said. “This 50 year old bridge needs to be replaced now. I hope the Southern Environmental Law Center will now stop their obstructionist behavior and allow the people of the Outer Banks to have a safe and reliable bridge.”
Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.